From Grey to Clear: Understanding the FATF Black List and the UAE’s Delisting—A Comprehensive Analysis

This study examines the Financial Action Task Force's (FATF) “black list” and “grey list”—lists of jurisdictions deemed deficient in anti-money laundering (AML) and counter‑terrorist financing (CFT) standards—and their implications for global financial flows and sovereign reputations. It then focuses on the United Arab Emirates (UAE), which was added to the FATF grey list in March 2022 and subsequently delisted in February 2024. By analyzing the criteria for FATF listings, the reforms undertaken by the UAE, and recent developments culminating in its removal from both FATF and EU high‑risk lists, this paper demonstrates how strategic regulatory alignment can restore trust in major financial hubs. This article provides a high‑level academic review suitable for policymakers, financial institutions, and scholars in regulatory affairs.

1. Introduction

The Financial Action Task Force (FATF), established in 1989, plays a pivotal role in combating money laundering and terrorist financing by setting international standards and monitoring compliance through a peer‑review process. As part of its monitoring, FATF annually publishes two formal inclusion lists: the “black list” (formally “High‑Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action”) and the “grey list” (formally “Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring”). While several countries are placed on grey lists pending remedial reforms, the black list includes nations with systemic strategic deficiencies that warrant urgent cross‑border due diligence enhancements or counter‑measures—historically only North Korea, Iran, and Myanmar have been blacklisted since 2022. Financial centers such as the UAE have occasionally been flagged. Its inclusion on the grey list in March 2022 was due to what FATF described as “strategic deficiencies” in AML/CFT policies—stemming from issues like weak enforcement, insufficient regulation of valuable commodities trade (e.g., gold), large inflow of foreign capital, and proximity to conflict zones. These deficiencies prompted both international concern and domestic regulatory responses.

2. The Nature and Consequences of FATF Listings

2.1 Definitions and Distinctions

• Black List: Includes jurisdictions labelled as non‑cooperative and high-risk, triggering enhanced due diligence and potential counter‑measures.

• Grey List: Serves as a warning list for jurisdictions with serious AML/CFT gaps who have committed to reform .

While FATF grey listing itself imposes no direct sanctions, it acts as a reputational warning—encouraging caution among global financial institutions. Listing on the black list, however, can lead to heightened penalties and tangible de-risking.

2.2 Financial and Reputational Costs

Grey- and black-listed jurisdictions often face elevated compliance costs, restricted access to international capital, reduced foreign direct investment (FDI), and over‑cautious stances from correspondent banks . Reuters noted that being added to the grey list in 2022 dampened UAE’s financial sector sentiment, though remedial reforms later helped reverse this.

3. The UAE: Timelines and Critical Reforms

3.1 Grey-List Inclusion (March 2022)

The FATF placed the UAE on its grey list on 4 March 2022 due to systemic gaps, particularly in supervising non‑financial businesses (e.g., precious metals dealers), enforcement shortfalls, and vulnerabilities to illicit inflows, including from conflict‑affected regions.

3.2 Domestic Responses and Structural Overhaul

The UAE swiftly initiated a suite of reforms, including:

1. Establishing an Executive Office to Combat Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing

2. Creating a specialist financial‑crime court

3. Launching online suspicious-transaction reporting systems and strengthening the Financial Intelligence Unit

4. Revamping AML/CFT legislation, including the 2018 AML Law and a 2024 Federal Decree elevating supervisory bodies to Cabinet-level status

Regulatory enforcement intensified: banks faced fines (a local bank was fined USD 1.6 million), and 32 precious‑metals firms lost their licences due to AML violations. Moreover, prosecutions related to money‑laundering rose significantly compared to 2021‑2022 .

3.3 FATF Grey-List Removal (February 2024)

At its plenary session in Paris on 23 February 2024, FATF removed the UAE from the grey list, recognising that the UAE had implemented the required action plan such as increased prosecution, registry improvements, and firm‑level regulatory oversight. This removal reflected an alignment of legal frameworks with FATF requirements and demonstrated operational effectiveness.

3.4 EU High-Risk (Black/Grey) List Changes

While FATF delisted the UAE in February 2024, the EU independently maintained the UAE on its high-risk list (akin to a regional “black/grey” list) until June 2025. On 12 June 2025, the EU removed the UAE from its high‑risk list, following parallel progress in AML reform and partly linked to the resumption of free trade agreement negotiations. This divergence in timing between FATF and EU underscores the differing underlying criteria and political considerations.

4. Analysis: Reforms, Assurance, and Remaining Risks

4.1 FATF Criteria vs Implementation

FATF assesses jurisdictions based on two axes: technical compliance and effectiveness, including real-world outcomes. The UAE advanced its technical frameworks through legislative and institutional reform, and improved effectiveness via enforcement—leading to reclassification of recommendations in its 2021 follow-up evaluation

4.2 Importance of Centralised Governance

The 2024 Federal Decree boosting Cabinet-level oversight of AML‑supervisory bodies establishes long‑term governance. Such centralisation aligns with global best practices, embedding AML within the UAE’s national policy agenda .

4.3 Reputation Management and Investment Flows

Delisting from both FATF and EU lists significantly enhances the UAE’s financial reputation, lowers compliance costs, and attracts foreign investment, while facilitating international banking relationships .

4.4 Persistent Risks and Vigilance

Despite progress, concerns remain:

• The speed and depth of enforcement action remain under scrutiny.

• Gold and high‑value trade networks still pose laundering threats 

• The influx of sanctioned Russian capital to Dubai underscores vulnerabilities that require sustained AML vigilance .

5. Implications for Other Jurisdictions

The UAE’s experience serves as a template for other jurisdictions flagged by FATF. It highlights a blueprint for delisting:

1. Secure political commitment at highest levels

2. Enact comprehensive legal frameworks in line with FATF recommendations

3. Establish robust institutional oversight

4. Demonstrate measurable enforcement in prosecutions and convictions

5. Maintain international dialogue, particularly with regional bodies (e.g., EU)

This model demonstrates that rapid and transparent corrective action can rebuild international trust in a global financial ecosystem.

6. Conclusion

FATF listing regimes—grey and black lists—serve as vital instruments in global financial governance, driving jurisdictions to upgrade AML/CFT frameworks. The UAE’s journey from grey-listing in March 2022 to delisting in February 2024, followed by EU removal in June 2025, illustrates how strategic reform can reverse reputational damage and restore confidence, even amidst geopolitical pressure. Continued enforcement, transparency, and alignment with global norms are critical to ensure lasting regulatory credibility and safeguard against future compliance lapses.

Hashtags

#AntiMoneyLaundering #FinancialRegulation #UAEReforms #FATF #GlobalFinance

References

• Stessens, G. (2001). The FATF 'Black List' of Non-Cooperative Countries or Territories. Leiden Journal of International Law.

• Chohan, U.W. (2019). The FATF in the Global Financial Architecture: Challenges and Implications. International, Transnational & Comparative Law Journal (SSRN).

• Findley, M.G., Nielson, D.L., & Sharman, J.C. (2013). Looking the Other Way: The El Dorado of Illicit Wealth. International Organization.

• FATF. (2021–2024). Mutual Evaluation and Follow‑up Reports: United Arab Emirates. FATF.

• Norton Rose Fulbright. (2024). UAE removed from the FATF grey list.

• Middle East Briefing. (2025). EU removes UAE from high‑risk money laundering list.

• S&P Global Market Intelligence. (2024). UAE banks still face money laundering risks despite enhanced controls.

• Vistra. (2023). Analysing the UAE’s removal from the FATF grey list.