top of page

Media and Journalism: Neutrality and the Influence of Big Corporations on Small Enterprises


The role of media and journalism in society is often perceived as neutral, objective, and fair. However, the neutrality of media has been increasingly questioned, particularly regarding its use by large corporations to influence public opinion and undermine small and emerging companies. This paper explores the complex dynamics of media and journalism, examining whether true neutrality exists and how big companies utilize media to maintain dominance and stifle competition. By analyzing contemporary literature and case studies, this research aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of media neutrality and the power dynamics at play, emphasizing the need for ethical journalism and regulatory oversight.

Keywords: Media Neutrality, Journalism, Corporate Influence, Small Enterprises, Ethical Journalism


Media and journalism are fundamental pillars of modern society, serving as conduits of information, watchdogs of democracy, and platforms for public discourse. However, the question of whether media and journalism are truly neutral remains contentious. This paper examines the concept of media neutrality and investigates how big corporations leverage media power to undermine small and young companies. By adhering to SCOPUS standards of academic publication, this research provides an in-depth analysis for students and professionals interested in the interplay between media, journalism, and corporate influence.

Theoretical Foundations of Media Neutrality

Understanding media neutrality requires a thorough examination of the theoretical underpinnings of journalism and media studies. This section discusses key theories and frameworks that inform the discourse on media neutrality.

1. The Fourth Estate The concept of the Fourth Estate positions the media as an independent entity that monitors and holds those in power accountable. It suggests that the media's primary role is to provide unbiased information and act as a guardian of public interest.

2. Agenda-Setting Theory Agenda-setting theory, proposed by Maxwell McCombs and Donald Shaw, posits that the media doesn't tell people what to think but rather what to think about. This theory highlights the power of the media in shaping public discourse and influencing perceptions.

3. Propaganda Model The propaganda model, introduced by Edward S. Herman and Noam Chomsky, argues that media content is influenced by the interests of those who own and control media organizations. This model suggests that media serves the interests of the elite, often at the expense of objectivity and neutrality.

The Role of Media and Journalism

To assess the neutrality of media and journalism, it is essential to understand their roles and functions in society. This section explores the primary functions of media and journalism and their implications for neutrality.

1. Information Dissemination Media and journalism are responsible for disseminating information to the public. This involves reporting news, providing analysis, and offering a platform for diverse voices. Neutrality in information dissemination requires accuracy, fairness, and impartiality.

2. Public Opinion Formation Media plays a crucial role in shaping public opinion. Through framing and representation, media can influence how issues are perceived and debated. Ensuring neutrality in this role is challenging but necessary for a healthy democratic process.

3. Watchdog Function As watchdogs, journalists investigate and expose wrongdoing, holding individuals and institutions accountable. This function requires independence from external influences to maintain credibility and neutrality.

Corporate Influence on Media and Journalism

The influence of big corporations on media and journalism is a critical issue that undermines neutrality. This section examines how corporate interests shape media content and affect small and emerging companies.

1. Ownership and Control Media ownership concentration has led to a few large corporations controlling significant portions of the media landscape. This concentration of ownership can result in biased reporting that favors corporate interests and marginalizes independent voices.

2. Advertising and Revenue Models Advertising is a major revenue source for media organizations. Dependence on advertising revenue can compromise editorial independence, as media outlets may avoid negative coverage of major advertisers or corporate sponsors.

3. Public Relations and Media Manipulation Corporations use public relations strategies to manage their public image and influence media coverage. By providing ready-made news content and exerting pressure on journalists, corporations can shape the narrative in their favor.

Case Studies of Media Bias and Corporate Influence

To illustrate the impact of corporate influence on media neutrality, this section presents case studies of media bias and its effects on small and emerging companies.

1. The Monsanto Case Monsanto, a major agricultural biotechnology corporation, has been accused of using its influence to suppress negative coverage and discredit critics. Investigative journalists who exposed the health risks associated with Monsanto's products faced significant pushback and legal threats.

2. The Apple-Foxconn Controversy Apple's relationship with Foxconn, a major supplier, has been the subject of media scrutiny due to poor labor practices. However, Apple's substantial advertising budget and influence have led to accusations of biased reporting and downplaying negative aspects.

3. The Uber and Lyft Conflict with Traditional Taxis Ride-sharing companies Uber and Lyft have used aggressive public relations campaigns to shape media coverage in their favor. Traditional taxi companies, often smaller and less influential, have struggled to compete against the favorable media portrayal of ride-sharing services.

The Impact on Small and Emerging Companies

Corporate influence on media not only affects public perception but also has tangible impacts on the viability of small and emerging companies. This section explores the challenges these companies face due to biased media coverage.

1. Market Entry Barriers Negative media coverage can create significant barriers for small companies trying to enter the market. Biased reporting that favors established corporations can deter investors, customers, and partners from engaging with new entrants.

2. Reputational Damage Unfavorable media portrayals can cause lasting reputational damage to small companies. Even if these portrayals are biased or inaccurate, the resulting negative perception can be difficult to overcome.

3. Unequal Competitive Landscape The preferential treatment of big corporations in the media can create an unequal competitive landscape. Small companies often lack the resources to counteract negative coverage or promote their positive attributes effectively.

Ethical Journalism and Regulatory Oversight

Addressing the challenges of media bias and corporate influence requires a commitment to ethical journalism and robust regulatory oversight. This section discusses strategies for promoting neutrality and protecting the interests of small and emerging companies.

1. Promoting Ethical Journalism Ethical journalism standards, such as those outlined by the Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ), emphasize accuracy, fairness, and independence. Adhering to these standards can help mitigate bias and ensure that media coverage is impartial and balanced.

2. Enhancing Media Literacy Media literacy education empowers the public to critically evaluate media content and recognize bias. By fostering a more informed and discerning audience, media literacy can reduce the impact of biased reporting.

3. Strengthening Regulatory Frameworks Regulatory bodies can play a crucial role in ensuring media diversity and preventing excessive concentration of ownership. Policies that promote transparency, accountability, and competition can help safeguard media neutrality.

Future Directions and Recommendations

The landscape of media and journalism is constantly evolving, and addressing the challenges of neutrality and corporate influence requires forward-thinking approaches. This section outlines future directions and recommendations for improving media neutrality.

1. Embracing Technological Innovations Technological advancements, such as blockchain and artificial intelligence, can enhance transparency and accountability in journalism. These technologies can help track the provenance of news content and detect biases.

2. Supporting Independent Journalism Independent journalism organizations, free from corporate influence, play a vital role in maintaining media diversity. Supporting these organizations through funding, legal protections, and public engagement is essential for a healthy media ecosystem.

3. Encouraging Public Participation Public participation in media production and oversight can help ensure that diverse perspectives are represented. Citizen journalism, community media initiatives, and public feedback mechanisms can contribute to a more balanced media landscape.


The neutrality of media and journalism is a complex and contentious issue, influenced by corporate interests and power dynamics. This paper has explored the theoretical foundations of media neutrality, the role of media and journalism, and the impact of corporate influence on small and emerging companies. By examining case studies and proposing strategies for ethical journalism and regulatory oversight, this research highlights the importance of maintaining a neutral and balanced media landscape. Ensuring media neutrality requires a collective effort from journalists, regulators, and the public to uphold the principles of fairness, accuracy, and independence.


  • Herman, E. S., & Chomsky, N. (2002). Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. Pantheon Books.

  • McCombs, M., & Shaw, D. (1972). The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media. Public Opinion Quarterly.

  • Kovach, B., & Rosenstiel, T. (2014). The Elements of Journalism: What Newspeople Should Know and the Public Should Expect. Three Rivers Press.

  • Curran, J., & Seaton, J. (2018). Power Without Responsibility: The Press, Broadcasting, and the Internet in Britain. Routledge.

  • Croteau, D., & Hoynes, W. (2019). Media/Society: Industries, Images, and Audiences. Sage Publications.


Recent Posts

See All


bottom of page