top of page
Search

Agentic Business Process Management: A GenAI‑Driven Transformation

  • Writer: OUS Academy in Switzerland
    OUS Academy in Switzerland
  • Jul 21
  • 3 min read

Author: Samuel Lewis

Affiliation: Independent researcher


Abstract

Agentic Business Process Management (Agentic BPM) represents a paradigm shift in organizational operations. Drawing upon three decades of foundational BPM research, this article introduces Agentic BPM—a discipline in which generative AI agents autonomously drive process execution, monitor performance, and dynamically adapt workflows. We explore historical context, system architecture, practitioner perspectives, benefits, and ethical implications. This analysis draws from recent practitioner interviews and current literature, offering a high‑level roadmap for future research and implementation.


1. Introduction

Business Process Management (BPM) traditionally formalized procedures through human-defined workflows. With the rise of generative AI (genAI), organizations are exploring Agentic BPM, where autonomous agents manage end‑to‑end processes. This article synthesizes historical developments, practical implications, and future directions for this emerging approach.


2. Historical Evolution of BPM and Agents

Over the past 30 years, BPM research cultivated tools for modeling, executing, and optimizing workflows. Initially manual and static, these systems gradually transitioned to dynamic, data‑driven platforms.

Concurrently, agent research—spanning intelligent software entities capable of perception, reasoning, and action—developed theoretical foundations for autonomy and inter-agent collaboration. The convergence of BPM and agentic principles built a foundation for Agentic BPM.


3. Defining Agentic BPM

Agentic BPM refers to process management systems that delegate process tasks to autonomous or semi-autonomous agents empowered by genAI. Core characteristics include:

  • Autonomy: Agents act independently based on goals and rules.

  • Adaptability: Agents sense and respond to changing data and context.

  • Collaboration: Agents and humans coordinate in hybrid workflows.

  • Governance: Human-defined policies regulate agent behavior.

This framework reconceptualizes agents not merely as tools but as full partners within business workflows.


4. Practitioner Insights

Recent interviews with BPM professionals offer rich insights:

  • Efficiency Gains: Agents accelerate monitoring and response in real time.

  • Predictive Insights: AI supports proactive decision-making.

  • Challenges: Data consistency issues, transparency, and human trust were noted.

  • Concerns: Risk of bias, overreliance, lack of explainability, and job displacement.

These findings highlight both promise and caution as firms pilot Agentic BPM.


5. Conceptual Framework

We propose a four-tier model:

  1. Sensing Layer: Agents collect real-time inputs from systems.

  2. Analysis Layer: GenAI analyzes data using ML and natural language.

  3. Execution Layer: Agents trigger actions like task assignments or system adjustments.

  4. Governance Layer: Humans define guardrails through policies and audits.

This multi-layered system combines agile responsiveness with oversight to maintain accountability.


6. Benefits of Agentic BPM

  • Operational Efficiency: Agents reduce cycle times.

  • Scalability: Multipurpose agents support expanding workflows.

  • Resilience: Dynamic agents respond swiftly to disruptions.

  • Insight Generation: AI-enhanced data fosters process innovation.

  • Human Focus: Employees move from routine tasks to strategic roles.


7. Risks and Governance

Transitioning to Agentic BPM introduces new risks:

  • Bias & Fairness: AI agents may learn and replicate biases.

  • Opacity: Decision-making becomes less transparent.

  • Reliability: Errors by agents may influence outcomes.

  • Labor Impact: Worker roles may be reshaped, requiring re-skilling.

To address these, we recommend:

  • Algorithmic transparency.

  • Regular audits and evaluation.

  • Inclusive training programs.

  • Policy frameworks ensuring human oversight.


8. Case Illustration

A manufacturing firm deploys agents to oversee quality assurance. Agents analyze real-time sensor data, detect anomalies like temperature spikes, and automatically initiate containment protocols—alerting managers as needed. This significantly reduces defects and accelerates incident response.


9. Research Agenda

Future studies should explore:

  • Governance Models: Policy designs enabling responsible agent autonomy.

  • Hybrid Teams: Optimal integration of human and AI roles.

  • Ethics & Explainability: Frameworks for traceability and fairness.

  • Measuring Impact: Quantitative studies on efficiency and human effects.

  • Domain-specific Applications: Agentic BPM in finance, healthcare, logistics.


10. Conclusion

Agentic BPM offers a bold vision of autonomous, intelligent, and adaptive organizational processes. By integrating genAI agents with robust governance, firms can achieve operational excellence and human-centric innovation. Yet, realizing its full potential demands careful attention to bias, transparency, and workforce transformation. Agentic BPM marks a transformative step in BPM scholarship and practice.


References

  • Vu, H., Klievtsova, N., Leopold, H., Rinderle‑Ma, S., & Kampik, T. (2025). Agentic Business Process Management: The Past 30 Years And Practitioners’ Future Perspectives. arXiv.

  • Shrestha, Y. R., Krishna, V., & von Krogh, G. (2020). Augmenting Organizational Decision‑Making with Deep Learning Algorithms: Principles, Promises, and Challenges. arXiv.

  • Kerstens, A. & Langley, D. J. (2025). “An Innovation Intermediary’s Role in Enhancing Absorptive Capacity for Cross‑Industry Digital Innovation: Introducing an Awareness Capability and New Intermediary Practices.” Journal of Business Research.

  • Mahajan, N. (2025). “Augmented Intelligence in Program Management: Enhancing Human Leadership with AI.” PM World Journal.

  • MIT Sloan Management Review. (2025). “Why Robots Will Displace Managers — and Create Other Jobs.”


 
 
 

This article is licensed under  CC BY 4.0

61e24181-42b7-4628-90bc-e271007e454d.jpeg
feb06611-ad56-49a5-970f-5109b1605966.jpeg

Open Access License Statement

© The Author(s). This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, adaptation, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and the source, and any changes made are indicated.

Unless otherwise stated in a credit line, all images or third-party materials in this article are included under the same Creative Commons license. If any material is excluded from the license and your intended use exceeds what is permitted by statutory regulation, you must obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

A full copy of this license is available at: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).

License

Copyright © U7Y Journal – The Seven Continents Yearbook of Research
All rights reserved.

How to Cite and Reference U7Y Journal Articles

To ensure consistency and proper academic recognition, all articles published in the U7Y Journal – The Seven Continents Yearbook of Research should be cited following internationally recognized bibliographic standards. The journal supports multiple citation styles to accommodate diverse academic disciplines and indexing systems.
Here are standard reference formats for citing articles published in the U7Y Journal – The Seven Continents Yearbook of Research (ISSN 3042-4399). Authors, readers, and indexing services may use any of the following styles according to their institutional or publisher requirements.
bottom of page